The SAVE program was created in 1986-1987, and was designed only to verify immigration status for public benefits, not citizenship, and not elections
SAVE
- does not show citizenship
- mislabels naturalized citizens
- produces inaccurate “noncitizen” lists
- creates legal liability
- triggers lawsuits
- causes wrongful purges
- is not designed for elections
The majority of states avoid it now, but there was a time in 2019 when Texas tried to use SAVE to flag noncitizens on voter rolls again. Unfortunately, thousands were naturalized citizens. There were lawsuits, and found that the list was so inaccurate that Texas had to withdraw it, and the Sec of State at the time resigned.
However, there was a notable incident in Texas in 2019 when the state attempted to use the program to flag noncitizens on voter rolls. Unfortunately, this effort resulted in the misidentification of thousands of naturalized citizens as noncitizens. The legal challenges that followed revealed the significant inaccuracies in the list, leading Texas to withdraw it and prompting the resignation of the Secretary of State at that time.
This didn’t create a policy change; it exposed the flaw.
This incident did not lead to a policy change; it exposed serious flaws in the program. In the 2000s, several states considered accessing SAVE and signing data-sharing agreements. DHS documentation started referencing SAVE as a verification tool for elections in various memos, not publicly.
In 2024-2025, a federal judge allowed access to SAVE and the voter rolls in Florida, Iowa, Indiana, and Ohio, which became politically charged.
Today, the same judge recognized the conflict but allowed four states, Florida, Iowa, Indiana, and Ohio, to have access to the SAVE system. This decision contradicted federal rulings and continues to lack the required notification process. While voters were being flagged quietly, public awareness is starting to explode.
I remember being asked about my name, spoken to in Spanish, being called into HR in the 80s and asked my country of origin. That same mindset — asking the wrong question to the wrong people — is exactly why SAVE is dangerous today.
SAVE cannot verify citizenship and does not contain citizenship data — which is why using it to purge voter rolls is fundamentally flawed.
To be sure, this blurb was due to the Democracy Docket’s great job of exposing the truth in the news
Sources: Democracy Docket, LWV, Brennan Center, ai and the Internet articles
You must be logged in to post a comment.